ACS Bibliography (with links)

Evolution of the ACS
Alexander, Charles H. “Still Rolling: Leslie Kish’s “Rolling Samples” and the American Community
Survey.” Survey Methodology 28 (2002): 35–41.
Alexander, Charles H. “Determination of Sample Size for the Intercensal Long Form Survey Prototype.”
Internal Census Bureau Report CM-8. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1993.
Alexander, Charles H. “Overview of Research on the “Continuous Measurement” Alternative for the U.S.
Census Bureau.” Internal Census Bureau Report CM-11. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1993.
Alexander, Charles H. “Three General Prototypes for a Continuous Measurement System.” Internal
Census Bureau Report CM-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1993.
Alexander, Charles H. “An Initial Review of Possible Continuous Measurement Designs.” Internal Census
Bureau Report CM-2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1992.
Herriot, Roger, David Bateman, and William F. McCarthy. “The Decade Census Program—A New
Approach for Meeting the Nation’s Needs for Sub-National Data.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section, 1989: 351–355.
Horvitz, Daniel G. “Statement to the Subcommittee on Census and Population, Committee on Post
Office and Civil Service, U.S. House of Representatives, May 1.” Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Research Triangle Institute, 1986.
Johnson, Bruce, and S. Rowland. “Directions for the Future of the U.S. Decennial Census in the 21st
Century.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section, 1989: 329–334.
Kish, Leslie. Using Cumulated Rolling Samples to Integrate Census and Survey Operations of the Census
Bureau. Washington, D.C.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Measuring America: The Decennial Censuses from 1790 to 2000. Washington,
D.C.:  U.S. Department of Commerce, 2002.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. “Implications of Continuous
Measurement for the Uses of Census Data in Transportation Planning.” Washington, D.C., 1996.
ACS Methods and Tests
Gage, Linda.  “Comparison of Census 2000 and American Community Survey 1999–2001
Estimates—San Francisco and Tulare Counties, California.” Report submitted to U.S. Census Bureau, 2004.
Hough, George C., and David A. Swanson. “The 1999–2001 American Community Survey and the 2000
Census—Data Quality and Data Comparisons—Multnomah County, Oregon.” Report submitted to U.S. Census Bureau, 2004.
National Research Council. “Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges.” Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey, Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton, Editors. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2007: Part II, Technical Issues.
Salvo, Joseph J., Arun Peter Lobo, and Timothy Calabrese. “Small Area Quality: A Comparison of
Estimates—2000 Census and the 1999–2001 ACS—Bronx, New York Test Site.” Report submitted to U.S. Census Bureau, 2004.
Salvo, Joseph J., Arun Peter Lobo, and Susan P. Love “Evaluating Continuous Measurement: Data Quality in the Bronx Test site of the American Community Survey,” with A.P. Lobo and S. P. Love.  Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol.28, No.4, 2003.
Tersine, Anthony G., Jr., and Mark E. Asiala. “Methodology for the Production of American Community
Survey Multiyear Estimates.” Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, 2007: 3018–3023.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Using the Data:  Quality Measures.” American Community Survey.  Accessed October 2010. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/sample_size_and_data_quality/.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Design and Methodology:  American Community Survey, (ACS-DM1/09).”
Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, April 2009.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparing Economic Characteristics with Census 2000.” American Community
Survey Evaluation Report Series, Report #5, 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparing General Demographic and Housing Characteristics with Census 2000.” 
American Community Survey Evaluation Report Series, Report #4, 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparing Quality Measures:  Comparing the American Community Survey’s
Three-Year Averages and Census 2000’s Long Form Sample Estimates.” American Community Survey Evaluation Report Series, Report #7, 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparing Selected Physical and Financial Housing Characteristics with Census
2000.” American Community Survey Evaluation Report Series, Report #10, 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparing Social Characteristics with Census 2000.” American Community             Survey
Evaluation Report Series, Report #9, 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparison for the American Community Survey 3-Year Average and the Census
2000 Sample for a Sample of Counties and Tracts.” American Community Survey Evaluation Report Series, Report #8, 2004.
U.S. Census Bureau. “The 2001–2002 Operational Feasibility Report of the American Community Survey.” American Community Survey Evaluation Report Series, Report #6, 2004.
ACS Use and Products
National Research Council. “Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges.” Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey, Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton, Editors. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2007: Part I:  Using the American Community Survey and Part III: Education, Outreach and Future Development.
ORC Macro. “The American Community Survey:  Challenges and Opportunities for HUD.” Report
submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2002.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Data Products from the American Community Survey.”  Accessed October 2010. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/presentations/ACS_Data_Products.ppt .
U.S. Census Bureau. “Data Dissemination.” In Design and Methodology American Community Survey, Chapter 14, Accessed October 2010. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/survey_methodology/acs_design_methodology_ch14.pdf .
U.S. Census Bureau. “Preparation and Review of Data Products.” In Design and Methodology American
U.S. Census Bureau.“Guidance for Data Users.” American Community Survey. Accessed October 2010.
U.S. Census Bureau. “Quick Guide to the 2008 American Community Survey (ACS) Products in
American FactFinder.”  Accessed October 2010. http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/aff_acs2008_quickguide.pdf  .
U.S. Census Bureau. “Comparing 2008 American Community Survey Data.” American Community Survey.
U.S. Census Bureau.  A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What PUMS Data Users Need to Know. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2009.  Accessed October 2010. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/guidance_for_data_users/handbooks/  .
U.S. Census Bureau. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What
Puerto Rico Community Survey Data Users Need to Know. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2009.  Accessed October 2010. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/guidance_for_data_users/handbooks/  .
U.S. Census Bureau. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know.  Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2008.  Accessed October 2010. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/guidance_for_data_users/handbooks/  .
U.S. Census Bureau. “Census 2000 Data Products at a Glance.” 2004.  Accessed October 2010.